Campbell Brown, Months Late on the Campaign Finance Broken Promise?
On tonight’s, No Bias, No Bull, CB brings up the past.
Without question, Obama has set the bar at new height with a truly staggering sum of cash. And that is why as we approach this November, it is worth reminding ourselves what Barack Obama said last November.
One year ago, he made a promise. He pledged to accept public financing and to work with the Republican nominee to ensure that they both operated within those limits.
Then it became clear to Sen. Obama and his campaign that he was going to be able to raise on his own far more cash than he would get with public financing. So Obama went back on his word.
Now, she mentions it because of the ridiculous display of that fund-raising that is tomorrow night’s address. I wonder, as much as I agree with her, is it relevant? Long ago, Obama’s moved was defended by apologists who argued that abandoning principle for good campaign sense was a good trait. Obama himself cloaked his broken promise in the rhetoric of doing the public a great favor, and of course it was mocked on SNL. McCain made hay out of it but his attacks looked cheap and politically expedient at the time, which, of course, they were.
On this issue today, former Sen. Bob Kerrey of Nebraska, an Obama supporter, writes in The New York Post, “a hypocrite is a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue — who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings. And that, it seems to me, is what we are doing now.”
For this last week, Sen. Obama will be rolling in dough. His commercials, his get-out-the-vote effort will, as the pundits have said, dwarf the McCain campaign’s final push. But in fairness, you have to admit, he is getting there in part on a broken promise.
So, Campbell ends well and my first reaction and question is why isn’t this bigger news. The second and more important reaction/question is why should it be, now? The fact of the matter is. It shouldn’t. Not because of the bailout but because quite frankly the past is the past. Nothing can be done now about fund-raising, promises, or anything else. The people who support Obama are going to continue doing so and for issues bigger than how many millions are spent electing him. The people who see his broken promises as character flaws will either stick with that opinion and not vote for him or vote on bigger issues. I don’t think anyone’s forgotten, I just think people who would care, have made up their minds and everyone else has moved on.
~ by Kyle on October 28, 2008.
Posted in Election 08, Media, News, Politics
Tags: Barack Obama, Campaign Finance, Campbell Brown, Election 08, Election 2008, Senator Obama

When did CAmpbell Brown become such an authority. Her programme these days are just based on opinions… wonder if the journalist is thee to report nws or lecture us. I don’t care if she is going after the left or right, or both. Her success simply seems to be going to her head. I can’t believe she will have monologues to open her program where she basically lectures us all.
Hope said this on October 28, 2008 at 9:11 pm |
I gave to the Obama campaign and I certainly support his purchase of 30 minute airtime from the different networks. What Campbell Brown needs to do is to state her real agenda in subsequent articles. Last week it was her defense of Palin’s expensive wardrobe this week it is an article on Obama’s expensive campaign. Campbell Brown conveniently refuses to comment on the legality of using campaign funds for cash for Palins personal use. She needs to join her colleagues at Fox before CNN looses most of their loyal customers.
Victor Lawson said this on October 28, 2008 at 9:13 pm |
So certainly I’d prefer it if all campaigns were conducted with entirely public funds: it would be good for democracy, freedom, the West, etc.
But the ironic thing is that Obama’s rejection of public financing is actually the CONSERVATIVE thing to do. He’s rejecting government funds (voluntary though they be), in favour of collecting small cheques from a broad swath of the electorate. In many ways, this is the most democratic thing he can do, more so than the Bush Pioneer style of bundling $2,300 cheques or Clintonesque $2,300-a-plate dinners. If all fundraising could be done this way, it would make me rethink my support for public financing.
(As an aside, it is worth pointing out that Sidney Mac also tried to reject public financing, but was blocked by the FEC because he had used the promise of funding as collateral for a loan when his primary campaign was in the toilet. I don’t think this is particularly relevant to the question in the original post, but I do think it underscores the need for a substantial revision of the public finance system.)
norwaynoah said this on October 28, 2008 at 9:18 pm |
Better late than never! It is about time the press criticize the “messiah”. This is but one of many topics that he should be brought to answer for. But, it seems since it is so late, that it merely an attempt in the final days of the campaign, for some one to be able to have appeared “fair handed” in their election coverage, which all Americans are painfully aware, has been ridiculously one sided and left them with no credibility what so ever. If Americans can so easily have the wool pulled over their eyes to elect a charlatan like Obama, it goes far to demonstrate the unthought of ease at which the anti-christ himself might also gain power. As a descendant of an early American war hero, I find myself for the first time in my life to be ashamed of nearly half the so-called Americans living in this free land they have taken for granted. On November 4th, freedom may be lost to thunderous applause. I am voting against the media.
Keith Perry said this on October 28, 2008 at 9:24 pm |
Commentary: Obama breaks promise on campaign finance
Campbell Brown, with all due respect, so did John McCain, he promised the American people that he would run a clean and above board campaign; a promise he went back on when he thought, for political expediency, he had to get down in the mud with a pig who wears lipstick.
So much for no bias, no bull!!!
You and I have every right to our opinions; it would behoove us both though to give both sides equal critique. I think the real issue the press and John McCain’s campaign have issue with the fact that Barack Obama raised so much money is because, he exceeded what your expectation was on all levels.
So, let’s talk about how Barack has exceeded: He exceeded in his fundraising, (the source of your gripe in tonight’s blog) he exceeded in the number of supporters (I like to call them people of substance) he exceeded in his get out the vote campaign (and no, they are not primarily blacks; as have been represented by every ethnic group and nationality), he exceeded in the manner of which he ran his campaign (professionally & with honor; not to mention leadership and organizational effort), he has exceeded in the polls and the poll of polls, and with early voters, absentee voters and individuals yet to vote! I can go on and on Campbell Brown in so many areas of the Obama Campaign but, you want to talk about money. So let’s!
I am one of the donors who could only send Barack OBama $15 & $25 contributions at a time and I together with many others did this because we thought it was well worth it to get Barack elected. I don’t know what Sen. McCain’s contributors gave him over the period of time that he has been campaigning for the office of Presidency but, whatever the amount, he lost confidence in his contributors willingness or ability to continue to support (financially) his efforts to get him to the White House, so he opted for public financing. I have thought about this and can only surmise that one of two things led Sen. McCain to limit his resources to Public Financing: 1. ) He was over-confident in his ability to win the White House with limited funds, or 2.) Sen. McCain’s base was never really behind his bid for the White House so they were not going to fund him ad-infinitum with his effort. (That includes all the primary candidates who dropped out of the race and endorsed him, just not with their money or that of their supporter). This was not the case for Obama! We gladly would have sacrificed month after month to get who we believe to be the best candidate for President of the United States! Plain and simple!
In your next op-ed, expand on this one by telling the American People about the donors that would show up to Barack Obama’s campaign offices and donate $1, $5, and $10 dollar amounts. We do this because we believe he will keep a more important promise to us, and that is getting this nation back to the place where we can heal, restore our prosperity and standing across this country and around the world. We believe he will keep his promise to help give healthcare to the millions of uninsured. We believe that he will end our dependence on foreign oil and jump start this economy beyond the initial bailout. We believe he will improve education for America’s children on all levels from pre-k to college. We believe he will care for our veterans in war and more importantly after the war! WE BELIEVE HE WILL KEEP A MORE IMPORTANT PROMISE FAR GREATER THAN THAT OF PUBLIC FINANCE. So, to you and anyone else that agrees with your perspective, Get over It.
Addiemae Barnes said this on October 28, 2008 at 9:35 pm |
I also left a comment on Brown’s commentary within minutes of its posting. They’re obviously rechecking their facts on this one and holding off on publishing comments critical of Brown, who is CNN’s new rising star. I like Brown, but she has gotten a couple of things wrong in the last few days. Yesterday, she ranted that “diva” was a sexist remark. Of course, it is. That’s the whole point of the term. “Macho” and “prima donna” are sexist terms, too. I like Brown and her direct, confrontive style, but she’s trying way too hard to present a balanced view of the candidates here. In this case, she’s bending over backwards to find fault with Obama. John McCain claims that Obama promised HIM that he would opt for public financing of his campaign. This is the only alleged “promise” that has been made, and I don’t believe there were any witnesses or stenographers present. Who knows what caveats Obama might’ve included in that agreement which McCain conveniently forgets now. In any case, when Obama realized that his candidacy was turning into a significant movement he knew that he had an opportunity to finance his campaign with donations that could far exceed the limits on public financed campaigns. At the time, he also knew that as the first African-American candidate for President, he would run into even more vicious tactics than John Kerry had encountered in 2004. The only way Obama had a realistic hope of winning this election would be to out-spend the Republican Party and all the little “swift-boat” organizations that would come out of the woodwork to defeat him. It was a canny political decision. While it would have been better if he had never discussed the campaign finance issue with McCain (assuming he ever did), Obama’s campaign has demonstrated that it was the right thing to do. Anything that McCain says now about this alleged “promise” is just sour grapes coming from a man who has run the worst-managed presidential campaign in U.S. history.
johnrj08 said this on October 28, 2008 at 9:44 pm |
I too left a reply. And it’s not showing up.
That Guy said this on October 28, 2008 at 10:15 pm |
I also left a reply and questioned the validity of her comments about the so called “promise”. She gave no evidence of where it came from. We have only McCain’s word and Obama has a different version. It is a toss up and therefore should not have really been an issue. ANyway, it is so ridiculous. Since when has the Republicans ever run an honorable campaign? Kind of like, they can dish it out but they can’t take it. Campbell, show us the proof.
Sebrina Alfonso said this on October 28, 2008 at 10:59 pm |
[...] doing this. However in response to this bit of commentary by CNN anchor Campbell Brown and my post on why I think it isn’t terribly important this late in the game, I’ve seen comments [...]
The 411: Obama’s Pledge On Public Financing « Vogue Republic said this on October 28, 2008 at 11:53 pm |
I am happy that most Americans who are leaving their posts don’t just accept the news which the get without critically thinking about its validity. It is your right to question the intentions, validity and truth of the news you get fed to you by all the networks – CNN, Fox ABc etc.
I enjoy reading the responses of the everyday person!
Ria said this on October 29, 2008 at 5:23 am |
Sarah Palin says that Barack Obama is not being candid with the American public
regarding taxes and associations. But exactly how straight is Sarah Palin being about
those subjects herself? Judge for yourself.
As Governor of Alaska Sarah Palin had this to say in Sept 2008:
“Alaska – we’re set up unlike other states in the union…collectively
Alaskans own the resources. So we SHARE IN THE WEALTH when the
development of these resources occur.”
As Governor of Alaska Sarah Palin associated with the radical Alaskan Independence Party, of which her husband Todd was recently a member of for over half a decade, speaking at a conference
in early 2008.
Alaskan Independence from what you might ask?
Alaskan Independence from the U.S.A!!!!
Where I come from that is called treason.
A quote from Joe Vogel, leader of the Alaskan Independence Party:
“I am an Alaskan, NOT an American. I have no use for America or any of her damned institutions.”
VOTE FOR DEMOCRACY NOT A REPUBLIC
USA not THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF USA
ED THE BUSINESS OWNER said this on October 29, 2008 at 6:00 am |
At a time when the country is running record deficits,private funding rather than public funding seems appropiate. I would have a problem if the playing field wasn’t level for both candidates. If John McCain thought he could raise enough money for his campaign he would have done it but he made the decision that he thought was to his advantage and Barack did the same.
Michael said this on October 29, 2008 at 6:07 am |
“So, Campbell ends well and my first reaction and question is why isn’t this bigger news.”
It isn’t bigger news because it is an “inconvenient truth” as far as the socialist media is concerned.
Thank God at least ONE personon the Clinton News Network has the backbone to see Obama for what he is.
krissmith777 said this on October 29, 2008 at 11:25 am |
While McCain had no choice but to accept public financing because of his obvious lack of funding and absudly run campaign, Obama is still responsible first to those that support him. Whether anyone likes it or not, Obama did take a great risk opting out of public financing. Past performance, afterall, is certainly not a guarantee even if commentators constantly refer to Obama’s campaign as though it were an unlimited A.T.M. Obama accepting public financing was and still would have been a serious mistake on the part of his campaign and supporters. In the primary, he needed enormous funds just to clean up after all Hillary Clinton’s glaring mistakes (and somehow McCain even surpassed that).
Yes, Obama has had many lapses in judgement over this very long campaign season, yet his final count is nowhere near as high as McCain’s.
Sharon said this on October 29, 2008 at 5:04 pm |